Landholdings where beaver may have impacts will not necessarily be those who benefit from reintroduction through tourism revenue etc.   How could this be dealt with?

Overall benefits of reintroduction would outweigh the likely cost of any impact, however there may be local instances where impacts are not matched by benefits.  

A Beaver Management Support Service is currently also being assessed. This could provide a network of advice on beaver. It may also be possible to arrange a localized rapid-reaction service for removal and translocation of beaver.

<back to faqs>